Imaging lens

ABSTRACT

An imaging lens having from an object to image side, a first lens having positive refractive power and a convex surface facing the object side, a second lens having a meniscus shape with negative refractive power and a concave surface facing the image side, a third lens having positive refractive power and a convex surface facing the object side, a fourth lens having a meniscus shape with positive refractive power and a convex surface facing the image side, and a fifth lens having negative refractive power and a concave surface facing the image side as a double-sided aspheric lens. A pole point at an off-axial point is provided on the image-side surface, and a below conditional expression (1) is satisfied: (1) 40&lt;|r6/f|&lt;90 where f: the focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens, and r6: curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens.

The present application is based on and claims priority of Japanesepatent application No. 2016-074947 filed on Apr. 4, 2016, the entirecontents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION Field of the Invention

The present invention relates to an imaging lens which forms an image ofan object on a solid-state image sensor such as a CCD sensor or a C-MOSsensor used in a compact imaging device, and more particularly to animaging lens which is built in an imaging device mounted in anincreasingly compact and low-profile mobile phone and smartphone, aportable terminal device such as PDA (Personal Digital Assistant), aninformation terminal such as a game console and a PC, and a homeappliance.

Description of the Related Art

In recent years, performance of the information terminals has beengreatly improved and it becomes common that a camera is mounted in manyinformation terminals including the smartphone. Furthermore, productshave been made one after another, such as home appliances with thecamera, which have begun to be widespread, and consumer's convenience isgreatly improved. Demand of products such as the information terminalsand the home appliances with the camera is more increased, anddevelopment of products is rapidly made accordingly.

In a conventional art, as an imaging lens intended to be relativecompact and to secure high performance, for example, following PatentDocuments 1 and 2 disclose such imaging lens.

Patent Document 1 (JP-A-2011-141396) discloses an imaging lenscomprising in order from an object side, a first lens having positiverefractive power, a second lens having negative refractive power, abiconvex third lens, a fourth lens having a meniscus shape with a convexsurface facing an image side, and a fifth lens having negativerefractive power which is gradually weakened from a center to aperipheral area and positive refractive power at the peripheral area.

Patent Document 2 (JP-A-2012-103717) discloses a single focus opticalsystem comprising in order from the object side, a first group of afirst lens having positive refractive power and a convex surface facingthe object side and a second lens having negative refractive power and aconcave surface facing the image side and including an aspheric surface,a second group of a third lens having the aspheric surface, and a thirdgroup of a fourth lens having positive refractive power and a convexsurface facing the image side and a fifth lens having negativerefractive power and a concave surface facing the image side andincluding an aspheric surface having a pole point.

In the imaging lens disclosed in the above Patent Document 1, field ofview is about 60 degrees, and recent requirement for the wide field ofview is not sufficiently satisfied. There is a problem of aberrationcorrection in the peripheral area therefor.

In the imaging lens disclosed in the above Patent Document 2, F-value isabout F2.8, and it is not a bright lens system sufficiently appropriatefor the image sensor which is compact and has high pixels. When thebright lens system is obtained while maintaining low-profileness and thewide field of view, there is a problem of aberration correction in theperipheral area therefor.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention has been made in view of the above problems, andan object of the present invention is to provide a compact imaging lenswith high resolution which realizes low-profileness, low F-value and awide field of view in well balance, and properly corrects aberrations.

Here, low-profile implies that total track length is smaller than 5 mm,and ratio of total track length to diagonal length is smaller than 0.9,and low F-value implies brightness having F2.4 or less. A wide field ofview implies that the field of view is 70 degrees or more which is arange capable of photographing. The diagonal length of the effectiveimaging plane of the image sensor for showing the ratio of total tracklength to diagonal length is taken as equal to the diameter of aneffective imaging circle whose radius is the vertical height from anoptical axis to the point where a light ray incident on the imaging lensat a maximum field of view forms the image on the image plane, namelytwice length of maximum image height.

Regarding terms used in the present invention, a convex surface or aconcave surface implies that the paraxial portion (portion near theoptical axis) of the surface is convex or concave. The pole pointimplies that an off-axial point on an aspheric surface at which atangential plane intersects the optical axis perpendicularly. The totaltrack length is defined as a distance along the optical axis from anobject-side surface of an optical element nearest to the object side tothe imaging plane, when thickness of the optical element such as an IRcut filter or a cover glass located between the last lens and theimaging plane of the image sensor is regarded as an air.

In order to achieve the above object, an imaging lens according to thepresent invention is to form an image of an object on a solid-stateimage sensor and comprises in order from an object side to an imageside, a first lens having positive refractive power and a convex surfacefacing the object side, a second lens having a meniscus shape withnegative refractive power and a concave surface facing the image side, athird lens having positive refractive power and a convex surface facingthe object side, a fourth lens having a meniscus shape with positiverefractive power and a convex surface facing the image side and a fifthlens having negative refractive power and a concave surface facing theimage side as a double-sided aspheric lens. A pole point at an off-axialpoint is provided on the image-side surface of the fifth lens, a belowconditional expression (1) is satisfied:40<|r6/f|<90  (1)

where

f: the focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens,and

r6: curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens.

The imaging lens of the above structure has a constitution similar tothe so-called telephoto type, and, in order from the object side, hasrefractive powers, positive, negative, positive, positive and negative.An appropriate refractive power is assigned to each lens and thelow-profileness can be provided.

According to the above structure, the first lens has positive refractivepower and a convex surface facing the object side. Having largerefractive power enables the low-profileness and the wide field of viewto the imaging lens. A shape of the first lens only has the convexsurface facing the object side, and may have a meniscus shape with theconvex surface facing the object side or a biconvex shape near theoptical axis.

The second lens has negative refractive power and the concave surfacefacing the image side, and properly corrects spherical aberration andchromatic aberration occurred on the first lens. A shape of the secondlens only has the concave surface facing the image side, and may have ameniscus shape with the concave surface facing the image side or abiconcave shape.

The third lens has the smallest positive refractive power among theconstituent lenses. The third lens has the positive refractive power,and properly corrects spherical aberration and coma aberration which thefirst lens and the second lens do not sufficiently correct, whilemaintaining the low-profileness. A shape of the third lens only has theconvex surface facing the object side, may have a meniscus shape withthe convex surface facing the object side, or a biconvex shape.

The fourth lens has large positive refractive power and convex surfacefacing the image side. The positive refractive power of the fourth lensis appropriately balanced with the first lens, and the low-profilenessand the wide field of view of the imaging lens are provided, therebyastigmatism and field curvature are properly corrected.

The fifth lens has negative refractive power and the concave surfacefacing the image side, and appropriate back focus is secured. The fifthlens is made as a double-sided aspheric lens and a pole point isprovided at an off-axial point on the image-side surface. Thereby, thereare effectively carried out correction of astigmatism, distortion andfield curvature, and control of Chief Ray Angle to the image sensor.

Conditional expression (1) defines an appropriate range of curvatureradius of the image-side surface of the third lens to the focal lengthof the overall optical system of the imaging lens. The conditionalexpression (1) is a condition for suppressing increase in eccentricsensitivity of the third lens and for properly correcting the sphericalaberration and the coma aberration. If the low-profileness of theimaging lens is provided, refractive power of each lens tends to belarge, and in addition to the first lens and the second lens near anaperture diameter, the eccentric sensitivity of the third lens may beincreased and productivity becomes deteriorated. By defining the rangeof the conditional expression (1), the refractive power of theimage-side surface of the third lens can be appropriately controlled tobe relative small, the increase in the eccentric sensitivity of thethird lens is suppressed and the spherical aberration and the comaaberration can be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens of the present invention, it is preferablethat a below conditional expression (2) is satisfied:0.5<(T1/f)*100<3.1  (2)

where

f: the focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens,and

T1: distance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of thefirst lens to the object-side surface of the second lens.

The conditional expression (2) defines an appropriate range of thedistance along the optical axis from the image-side surface of the firstlens to the object-side surface of the second lens to the focal lengthof the overall optical system of the imaging lens. The conditionalexpression (2) is a condition for proper correction of the distortionand the field curvature, and for excellent assembly property of theimaging lens, while providing the low-profileness of the imaging lens.If the value of below the upper limit of the conditional expression (2),an air interval on the optical axis between the first lens and thesecond lens does not become too large, and there are suppresseddifficulty in the low-profileness and increase in the distortion and thefield curvature. If the value is above the lower limit of theconditional expression (2), the air interval on the optical axis betweenthe first lens and the second lens does not become too small, and riskof contacting the first lens and the second lens in assembly work can besuppressed.

According to the imaging lens of the present invention, it is preferablethat a below conditional expression (3) is satisfied:0.3<f1/|f2|<0.6  (3)

where

f1: focal length of the first lens, and

f2: focal length of the second lens.

The conditional expression (3) defines an appropriate range ofrelationship of the focal length of the first lens and the focal lengthof the second lens, and is a condition for providing both of thelow-profileness of the imaging lens and proper correction of thechromatic aberration. If the value of below the upper limit of theconditional expression (3), it is suppressed that the negativerefractive power of the second lens becomes relatively small to thepositive refractive power of the first lens, and it is advantageous tothe low-profileness. If the value is above the lower limit of theconditional expression (3), it is suppressed that the negativerefractive power of the second lens becomes relatively large to thepositive refractive power of the first lens, and the low-profileness,and correction of axial chromatic aberration and chromatic aberration ofmagnification are facilitated.

According to the imaging lens of the present invention, it is preferablethat a below conditional expression (4) is satisfied:−27<f45/f<−3  (4)

where

f: the focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens,and

f45: the composite focal length of the fourth lens and the fifth lens.

The conditional expression (4) defines an appropriate range ofrelationship of the composite focal length of the fourth lens and thefifth lens and the focal length of the overall optical system of theimaging lens. The conditional expression (4) is a condition for securingback focus and suppressing an angle of light ray incident to the imagesensor, while providing the low-profileness. If the value of below theupper limit of the conditional expression (4), it can be suppressed thatthe total track length become large. If the value is above the lowerlimit of the conditional expression (4), the back focus is preventedfrom being small, and there is suppressed difficulty in sufficientlysecuring a space for arranging the IR cut filter or the like and incontrolling the angle of light ray incident to the image sensor.

According to the imaging lens of the present invention, it is preferablethat a below conditional expression (5) is satisfied:0.6<D4/D5<1.6  (5)

where

D4: thickness on the optical axis of the fourth lens, and

D5: thickness on the optical axis of the fifth lens.

The conditional expression (5) defines an appropriate range of thethickness on the optical axis of the fourth lens and the fifth lens, anda condition for securing formability of the fourth lens and the fifthlens while providing the low-profileness of the imaging lens. If thevalue of below the upper limit of the conditional expression (5), it canbe suppressed that a center thickness of the fifth lens is too small,and the excellent formability can be secured. The convex surface facingthe image side of the fourth lens has the large positive refractivepower, and curvature becomes relatively large in comparison with thecurvature of the object-side surface. Thereby, the convex surface facingthe image side of the fourth lens becomes an aspherical surface which anedge thickness becomes small. If the value is above the lower limit ofthe conditional expression (5), the edge thickness does not become toosmall, and the excellent formability can be secured. Herein, the centerthickness implies a thickness in an optical axis direction at a centerof the lens, namely, a distance between the object-side surface and theimage-side surface, and in the present invention, the center of the lenscorresponds to the optical axis. The edge thickness is a thickness inthe optical axis direction at a peripheral of the lens.

According to the imaging lens of the present invention, it is preferablethat a below conditional expression (6) is satisfied:−6.9<r9/r10<−1.2  (6)

where

r9: curvature radius of the object-side surface of the fifth lens, and

r10: curvature radius of the image-side surface of the fifth lens.

The conditional expression (6) defines an appropriate range ofrelationship of the curvature radius of the object-side surface of thefifth lens and the curvature radius of the image-side surface of thefifth lens, and is a condition for properly correcting the distortionand facilitating manufacturability. If the value of below the upperlimit of the conditional expression (6), it is suppressed that thedistortion becomes deteriorated, and a ratio of uneven thickness whichis a ratio of the thinnest part and the thickest part becomes large andthe formability becomes deteriorated. If the value is above the lowerlimit of the conditional expression (6), deterioration of the distortionis suppressed, it is also suppressed that the edge interval between thefourth lens and the fifth lens becomes too large, and a spacer forestablishing a mechanism will become unnecessary.

According to the imaging lens of the present invention, it is preferablethat a below conditional expression (7) is satisfied:TLA/2ih<0.9  (7)

where

TLA: total track length in air, and

ih: maximum image height.

The conditional expression (7) defines a ratio of total track length todiagonal length. If the value of below the upper limit of theconditional expression (7), the total track length does not become toolarge, and demand of the low-profileness of the imaging lens iseffectively met.

According to the imaging lens of the present invention, it is preferablethat a below conditional expression (8) is satisfied:0.7ih/f<1.0  (8)

where

f: the focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens,and

ih: maximum image height.

The conditional expression (8) defines a range of photographic field ofview. If the value of below the upper limit of the conditionalexpression (8), the field of view does not become too large, a deviationfrom a range capable of properly correcting aberrations is not made,difficulty in correction of aberrations particularly in peripheral areaof the image plane is prevented, and deterioration in opticalperformance is suppressed. If the value is above the lower limit of theconditional expression (8), the wide field of view can be effectivelyprovided, the focal length of the overall optical system of the imaginglens does not become too large and it is advantageous to thelow-profileness.

According to the imaging lens of the present invention, the third lenspreferably has the convex surface facing the image side.

When the image-side surface of the third lens is formed as a convexsurface, an emitting angle of the light ray emitted from the surface canbe small. Thereby, the spherical aberration and the coma aberrationwhich increase in accordance with shortening of the total track lengthcan be properly corrected.

According to the imaging lens of the present invention, it is preferablethat a below conditional expression (9) is satisfied:6<r6/r7  (9)

where

r6: curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens, and

r7: curvature radius of the object-side surface of the fourth lens.

The conditional expression (9) defines appropriate range of relationshipof the curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens andthe curvature radius of the object-side surface of the fourth lens. Bydefining the range of the conditional expression (9), increase ineccentric sensitivity of the third lens is suppressed and correction ofthe field curvature of the fourth lens are facilitated while providingthe low-profileness of the imaging lens.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 is a schematic view showing a general configuration of an imaginglens in Example 1 according to the present invention;

FIG. 2 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of theimaging lens in Example 1 according to the present invention;

FIG. 3 is a schematic view showing the general configuration of animaging lens in Example 2 according to the present invention;

FIG. 4 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of theimaging lens in Example 2 according to the present invention;

FIG. 5 is a schematic view showing the general configuration of animaging lens in Example 3 according to the present invention;

FIG. 6 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of theimaging lens in Example 3 according to the present invention;

FIG. 7 is a schematic view showing the general configuration of animaging lens in Example 4 according to the present invention;

FIG. 8 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of theimaging lens in Example 4 according to the present invention;

FIG. 9 is a schematic view showing the general configuration of animaging lens in Example 5 according to the present invention; and

FIG. 10 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of theimaging lens in Example 5 according to the present invention.

FIG. 11 is a schematic view showing the general configuration of animaging lens in Example 6 according to the present invention;

FIG. 12 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of theimaging lens in Example 6 according to the present invention;

FIG. 13 is a schematic view showing the general configuration of animaging lens in Example 7 according to the present invention; and

FIG. 14 shows spherical aberration, astigmatism, and distortion of theimaging lens in Example 7 according to the present invention.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

Hereinafter, the preferred embodiment of the present invention will bedescribed in detail referring to the accompanying drawings.

FIGS. 1, 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13 are schematic views showing the generalconfigurations of the imaging lenses in Examples 1 to 7 according to theembodiments of the present invention, respectively. Since all theseexamples have the same basic lens configuration, the generalconfiguration of an imaging lens according to this embodiment isexplained below mainly referring to the schematic view of Example 1.

As shown in FIG. 1, the imaging lens according to this embodimentcomprises in order from an object side to an image side, an aperturestop ST, a first lens L1 having positive refractive power, a second lensL2 having negative refractive power, a third lens L3 having positiverefractive power, a fourth lens L4 having positive refractive power, anda fifth lens L5 having negative refractive power. A filter IR such as anIR cut filter and a cover glass is located between the fifth lens L5 andan image plane IM, namely the image plane of the imaging sensor. Thefilter IR is omissible.

The imaging lens comprising the above five constituent lenses has aconstitution similar to the so-called telephoto type, and, in order fromthe object side, has refractive powers, positive, negative, positive,positive and negative. An appropriate refractive power is allocated toeach lens and the low-profileness can be provided.

In the imaging lens comprising the above five constituent lenses, thefirst lens L1 is a meniscus lens having the positive refractive powerand the convex surface facing the object side. The image-side surface ofthe first lens L1 may have a concave surface having curvature radiuslarger than the curvature radius of the object-side surface within arange which the refractive power is not too lowered and an amount ofspherical aberration is not increased, and thereby low-profileness andwide field of view of the imaging lens are provided. The first lens L1may be biconvex. In such case, the positive refractive power isappropriately allocated to the object-side surface and the image-sidesurface, and large positive refractive power is provided whilesuppressing occurrence of the spherical aberration, and furtherlow-profileness and wide field of view of the imaging lens can beprovided.

The second lens L2 is a meniscus lens having the negative refractivepower and the concave surface facing the image side, and properlycorrects the spherical aberration and the chromatic aberration occurredon the first lens L1.

The third lens L3 is a meniscus lens having the positive refractivepower and the convex surface facing the object side. The third lens hasthe smallest positive refractive power among the constituent lenses ofthe imaging lens. The third lens has the positive refractive power, andproperly corrects the spherical aberration and the coma aberration whichthe first lens L1 and the second lens L2 can not sufficiently correct,while maintaining the low-profileness. A shape of the third lens is notlimited to the shape of the present embodiment 1. For example, as shownin Examples 2 to 7 in FIGS. 3, 5, 7, 9, 11 and 13, the third lens L3 hasa biconvex shape having the convex surface facing the image side.

The fourth lens L4 is a meniscus lens having large positive refractivepower and convex surface facing the image side. The positive refractivepower of the fourth lens L4 is appropriately balanced with the firstlens L1, and the low-profileness and the wide field of view of theimaging lens are provided, thereby the astigmatism and the fieldcurvature are properly corrected.

The fifth lens L5 has the negative refractive power and the concavesurfaces facing the object side and the image side, and appropriate backfocus are secured. The fifth lens L5 is made as a double-sided asphericlens and the image-side surface is aspheric lens which a pole point isprovided at an off-axial point. Thereby, proper correction of theastigmatism, the distortion and the field curvature is made, and ChiefRay Angle to the image sensor is controlled in an appropriate range.

The aperture stop ST is located between a vertex of the object-sidesurface of the first lens L1 and the peripheral area of the surface, andan entrance pupil position goes away from the image surface IM, andsecuring telecentricity becomes easy.

The imaging lens according to the present embodiments facilitatesmanufacture by using plastic materials to all of the lenses, and makesmass production in a low price possible. Both surfaces of all of thelenses are aspheric surfaces, and the aberrations are properlycorrected.

The imaging lens according to the present embodiments satisfies belowconditional expressions (1) to (9), and preferable effect is provided:40<|r6/f|<90  (1)0.5<(T1/f)*100<3.1  (2)0.3<f1/|f2<|0.6  (3)−27<f45/f<−3  (4)0.6<D4/D5<1.6  (5)−6.9<r9/r10<−1.2  (6)TLA/2ih<0.9  (7)0.7<ih/f<1.0  (8)6<r6/r7  (9)

where

f: the focal length of the overall optical system of the imaging lens,

f1: focal length of the first lens L1, and

f2: focal length of the second lens L2.

f45: the composite focal length of the fourth lens L4 and the fifth lensL5.

r6: curvature radius of the image-side surface of the third lens L3.

r7: curvature radius of the object-side surface of the fourth lens L4.

r9: curvature radius of the object-side surface of the fifth lens L5,and

r10: curvature radius of the image-side surface of the fifth lens L5.

D4: thickness on the optical axis X of the fourth lens L4, and

D5: thickness on the optical axis X of the fifth lens L5.

T1: distance along the optical axis X from the image-side surface of thefirst lens L1 to the object-side surface of the second lens L2.

TLA: total track length in air, and

ih: maximum image height.

The imaging lens according to the present embodiments satisfies belowconditional expressions (1a) to (9a), and preferable effect is provided:45<|r6/f|<70  (1a)0.54<(T1/f)*100<2.8  (2a)0.35<f1/|f2<0.55  (3a)−20<f45/f<−3.3  (4a)0.7D4/D5<1.45  (5a)−6.3<r9/r10<−1.3  (6a)TLA/2ih<0.8  (7a)0.75<ih/f<0.93  (8a)6.8<r6/r7<60  (9a)

where signs of each conditional expression are same as that in the lastparagraph.

Furthermore, the imaging lens according to the present embodimentssatisfies below conditional expressions (1b) to (9b), and particularlypreferable effect is provided:49.30≤|r6/f|≤52.24  (1b)0.58≤(T1/f)*100≤2.56  (2b)0.39≤f1/|f2|≤0.51  (3b)−14.42≤f45/f≤−3.56  (4b)0.78≤D4/D5≤1.32  (5b)−5.74≤r9/r10<−1.44  (6b)TLA/2ih≤0.70  (7b)0.82≤ih/f≤0.85  (8b)7.56≤r6/r7≤55.55  (9b)

where signs of each conditional expression are same as that in oneparagraph before the last paragraph.

In the imaging lens according to the present embodiments, it ispreferable to satisfy all of conditional expressions. By satisfying theconditional expression individually, operational advantage correspondingto each conditional expression can be obtained.

In this embodiment, the aspheric shapes of the surfaces of the asphericlens are expressed by Equation 1, where Z denotes an axis in the opticalaxis direction, H denotes a height perpendicular to the optical axis, kdenotes a conic constant, and A4, A6, A8, A10, A12, A14, and A16 denoteaspheric surface coefficients.

$\begin{matrix}{Z = {\frac{\frac{H^{2}}{R}}{1 + \sqrt{1 - {\left( {k + 1} \right)\frac{H^{2}}{R^{2}}}}} + {A_{4}H^{4}} + {A_{6}H^{6}} + {A_{8}H^{8}} + {A_{10}H^{10}} + {A_{12}H^{12}} + {A_{14}H^{14}} + {A_{16}H^{16}}}} & {{Equation}\mspace{14mu} 1}\end{matrix}$

Next, examples of the imaging lens according to this embodiment will beexplained. In each example, f denotes the focal length of the overalloptical system of the imaging lens, Fno denotes an F-number, ω denotes ahalf field of view, and ih denotes a maximum image height. Additionally,i denotes surface number counted from the object side, r denotes acurvature radius, d denotes the distance of lenses along the opticalaxis (surface distance), Nd denotes a refractive index at d-ray(reference wavelength), and vd denotes an abbe number at d-ray. As foraspheric surfaces, an asterisk (*) is added after surface number i.

Example 1

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Numerical Data Example 1 Unit mm f = 4.00 ih = 3.26 Fno = 2.19TLA = 4.58 ω (°) = 38.8 Surface Data Surface Curvature SurfaceRefractive Abbe Number i Radius r Distance d index Nd Number νd (Object)Infinity Infinity  1 (Stop) Infinity −0.25900  2* 1.51762 0.58514 1.54455.57  3* 24.68794 0.04131  4* 10.85217 0.24137 1.650 21.54  5* 2.791270.38567  6* 60.63899 0.46745 1.535 56.16  7* 197.16140 0.38290  8*−6.69444 0.52088 1.535 56.16  9* −1.27267 0.38625 10* −3.11964 0.594461.535 56.16 11* 1.92354 0.50000 12 Infinity 0.21000 1.517 64.20 13Infinity 0.33339 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data Lens StartSurface Focal Length 1 2 2.95 2 4 −5.85 3 6 163.61 4 8 2.84 5 10 −2.14Aspheric Surface Data Second Surface Third Surface Fourth Surface FifthSurface Sixth Surface Seventh Surface k 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 −2.149730E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A4 7.506331E−03−1.394127E−01 −1.625579E−01 −2.462439E−02 −1.129055E−01 −7.915829E−02 A6−4.512954E−02 4.693264E−01 6.236078E−01 2.627730E−01 −1.091413E−01−1.165505E−01 A8 1.006751E−01 −6.703280E−01 −8.557027E−01 −2.428849E−013.006164E−01 1.421465E−01 A10 −8.764735E−02 2.820225E−01 3.765263E−016.983993E−02 −3.330509E−01 −1.154202E−01 A12 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+002.557405E−02 7.024283E−02 1.715749E−01 4.978464E−02 A14 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A160.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 Eighth Surface Ninth Surface Tenth Surface Eleventh Surfacek 0.000000E+00 −5.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 −1.178417E+01 A4 1.670236E−02−7.644651E−02 −4.294930E−02 −6.811694E−02 A6 9.838990E−02 1.803216E−012.119091E−02 2.594775E−02 A8 −2.770284E−01 −1.332146E−01 −1.783729E−05−7.494030E−03 A10 2.824681E−01 4.865946E−02 −1.022848E−03 1.262376E−03A12 −1.673378E−01 −9.370523E−03 1.745288E−04 −1.222612E−04 A145.173233E−02 9.278256E−04 −8.576592E−06 5.279832E−06 A16 −6.121296E−03−4.546733E−05 −1.050195E−07 0.000000E+00

The imaging lens in Example 1 is a concave surface facing the image-sidesurface of the third lens L3, and satisfies conditional expressions (1)to (8) as shown in Table 8.

FIG. 2 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), and distortion(%) of the imaging lens in Example 1. The spherical aberration diagramshows the amount of aberration at wavelengths of F-ray (486 nm), d-ray(588 nm), and C-ray (656 nm). The astigmatism diagram shows the amountof aberration at d-ray on a sagittal image surface S and on tangentialimage surface T (same as FIG. 4, FIG. 6, FIG. 8, FIG. 10, FIG. 12 andFIG. 14). As shown in FIG. 2, each aberration is corrected properly.

Total track length in air TLA is 4.58 mm, ratio of total track length todiagonal length is 0.70 as low-profile, and the imaging lens hasbrightness of F2.19 and wide field of view of about 78 degrees.

Example 2

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 2.

TABLE 2 Numerical Data Example 2 Unit mm f = 3.98 ih = 3.26 Fno = 2.23TLA = 4.58 ω (°) = 38.9 Surface Data Surface Curvature SurfaceRefractive Abbe Number i Radius r Distance d index Nd Number νd (Object)Infinity Infinity  1 (Stop) Infinity −0.24000  2* 1.56056 0.58300 1.54455.57  3* 26.80109 0.02300  4* 8.73695 0.24000 1.650 21.54  5* 2.700270.36300  6* 34.57651 0.44100 1.535 55.66  7* −200.00000 0.44200  8*−8.77001 0.57900 1.535 55.66  9* −1.14860 0.28100 10* −2.53481 0.555001.535 55.66 11* 1.75621 0.50000 12 Infinity 0.21000 1.517 64.20 13Infinity 0.43179 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data Lens StartSurface Focal Length 1 2 3.02 2 4 −6.10 3 6 55.16 4 8 2.41 5 10 −1.86Aspheric Surface Data Second Surface Third Surface Fourth Surface FifthSurface Sixth Surface Seventh Surface k 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 −5.068472E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A4 7.240529E−03−1.563956E−01 −1.597128E−01 2.636697E−03 −1.339025E−01 −1.028082E−01 A6−6.336851E−02 6.364296E−01 7.156695E−01 2.015644E−01 −1.440998E−02−7.327623E−02 A8 1.308109E−01 −1.073601E+00 −1.076893E+00 −1.236456E−017.493373E−02 9.485240E−02 A10 −1.169101E−01 5.223934E−01 4.062211E−01−1.053361E−01 −6.358959E−02 −8.553052E−02 A12 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+001.252621E−01 1.565510E−01 6.984236E−02 5.216489E−02 A14 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A160.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 Eighth Surface Ninth Surface Tenth Surface Eleventh Surfacek 0.000000E+00 −5.771409E+00 0.000000E+00 −1.359327E+01 A4 7.600140E−03−1.427150E−01 −2.693519E−02 −6.612270E−02 A6 1.576240E−03 2.667844E−011.811724E−02 2.484268E−02 A8 −5.580430E−02 −2.307502E−01 8.583729E−04−7.312510E−03 A10 2.997161E−02 1.172813E−01 −9.856002E−04 1.239458E−03A12 −9.574490E−03 −3.535014E−02 1.270532E−04 −1.144278E−04 A142.239293E−03 5.849207E−03 −3.483129E−06 3.416440E−06 A16 −6.577247E−05−4.157181E−04 −5.429639E−08 1.513706E−07

The imaging lens in Example 2 is a convex surface facing the image-sidesurface of the third lens L3, and satisfies conditional expressions (1)to (9) as shown in Table 8.

FIG. 4 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), and distortion(%) of the imaging lens in Example 2. As shown in FIG. 4, eachaberration is corrected properly.

Total track length in air TLA is 4.58 mm, ratio of total track length todiagonal length is 0.70 as low-profile, and the imaging lens hasbrightness of F2.23 and wide field of view of about 78 degrees.

Example 3

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 3.

TABLE 3 Numerical Data Example 3 Unit mm f = 3.90 ih = 3.26 Fno = 2.25TLA = 4.58 ω (°) = 39.4 Surface Data Surface Curvature SurfaceRefractive Abbe Number i Radius r Distance d Index Nd Number νd (Object)Infinity Infinity  1 (Stop) Infinity −0.23500  2* 1.52460 0.54400 1.54455.86  3* 5.48510 0.04000  4* 3.43400 0.24000 1.650 21.54  5* 2.136000.33400  6* 10.76760 0.45700 1.535 55.66  7* −200.00000 0.42400  8*−4.72400 0.59700 1.535 55.66  9* −1.17030 0.16600 10* −7.72750 0.700001.535 55.66 11* 1.34570 0.50000 12 Infinity 0.21000 1.517 64.20 13Infinity 0.43653 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data Lens StartSurface Focal Length 1 2 3.70 2 4 −9.37 3 6 19.12 4 8 2.75 5 10 −2.09Aspheric Surface Data Second Surface Third Surface Fourth Surface FifthSurface Sixth Surface Seventh Surface k 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A4 5.965788E−03−3.904468E−01 −4.769130E−01 −1.770315E−01 −1.398482E−01 −7.015717E−02 A6−4.259745E−02 9.961244E−01 1.263878E+00 5.335076E−01 3.408424E−02−1.179972E−01 A8 9.262561E−02 −1.222717E+00 −1.534201E+00 −5.708824E−01−5.772230E−03 1.615642E−01 A10 −8.437085E−02 5.116779E−01 6.859739E−012.867518E−01 −1.027615E−02 −1.475939E−01 A12 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 5.290532E−02 6.936953E−02 A14 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A160.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 Eighth Surface Ninth Surface Tenth Surface Eleventh Surfacek 0.000000E+00 −5.975160E+00 0.000000E+00 −7.953296E+00 A4 8.929992E−02−1.517063E−01 −1.358220E−01 −8.954259E−02 A6 −2.252590E−01 2.440136E−012.173619E−02 3.894070E−02 A8 3.181359E−01 −2.965473E−01 2.875281E−02−1.317083E−02 A10 −3.788393E−01 2.409682E−01 −1.360741E−02 2.993411E−03A12 2.790644E−01 −1.072198E−01 2.274175E−03 −4.431562E−04 A14−1.105173E−01 2.374075E−02 −1.284650E−04 3.755446E−05 A16 1.786434E−02−2.066682E−03 −1.148335E−06 −1.339408E−06

The imaging lens in Example 3 is a convex surface facing the image-sidesurface of the third lens L3, and satisfies conditional expressions (1)to (9) as shown in Table 8.

FIG. 6 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), and distortion(%) of the imaging lens in Example 3. As shown in FIG. 6, eachaberration is corrected properly.

Total track length in air TLA is 4.58 mm, ratio of total track length todiagonal length is 0.70 as low-profile, and the imaging lens hasbrightness of F2.25 and wide field of view of about 79 degrees.

Example 4

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 4.

TABLE 4 Numerical Data Example 4 Unit mm f = 3.92 ih = 3.26 Fno = 2.08TLA = 4.58 ω (°) = 39.3 Surface Data Surface Curvature SurfaceRefractive Abbe Number i Radius r Distance d Index Nd Number νd (Object)Infinity Infinity  1 (Stop) Infinity −0.30501  2* 1.46800 0.55834 1.54455.86  3* 3.93602 0.10029  4* 3.05060 0.24000 1.650 21.54  5* 2.000000.26100  6* 5.80615 0.48839 1.535 55.66  7* −200.00000 0.45017  8*−3.60020 0.59130 1.535 55.66  9* −0.97127 0.05000 10* −3.96086 0.755001.535 55.66 11* 1.30408 0.50000 12 Infinity 0.21000 1.517 64.20 13Infinity 0.44436 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data Lens StartSurface Focal Length 1 2 3.98 2 4 −9.81 3 6 10.56 4 8 2.31 5 10 −1.75Aspheric Surface Data Second Surface Third Surface Fourth Surface FifthSurface Sixth Surface Seventh Surface k 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A4 3.340983E−03−1.541695E−01 −3.193269E−01 −2.270911E−01 −1.233168E−01 −5.874683E−02 A6−9.074487E−04 2.298893E−01 5.195820E−01 4.368899E−01 1.478043E−02−5.717421E−02 A8 1.934225E−02 −8.550991E−02 −3.211624E−01 −2.714883E−011.400470E−02 4.524631E−02 A10 −3.491802E−03 −4.518595E−02 9.594125E−057.685172E−02 1.610789E−02 −5.570491E−02 A12 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 1.498791E−02 3.858503E−02 A14 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A160.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 Eighth Surface Ninth Surface Tenth Surface Eleventh Surfacek 0.000000E+00 −2.399836E+00 0.000000E+00 −9.293360E+00 A4 5.186728E−029.629135E−02 −9.538889E−02 −8.925838E−02 A6 −1.079081E−01 −1.906765E−011.149096E−02 4.363381E−02 A8 1.419318E−01 2.144282E−01 2.921532E−02−1.725350E−02 A10 −1.812094E−01 −1.097595E−01 −1.343619E−02 4.387023E−03A12 1.355319E−01 2.694781E−02 2.272898E−03 −6.917903E−04 A14−5.953312E−02 −2.843158E−03 −1.297585E−04 5.944739E−05 A16 1.157691E−026.311781E−05 −1.446658E−06 −2.060227E−06

The imaging lens in Example 4 is a convex surface facing the image-sidesurface of the third lens L3, and satisfies conditional expressions (1)to (9) as shown in Table 8.

FIG. 8 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), and distortionthe imaging lens in Example 4. As shown in FIG. 8, each aberration iscorrected properly.

Total track length in air TLA is 4.58 mm, ratio of total track length todiagonal length is 0.70 as low-profile, and the imaging lens hasbrightness of F2.08 and wide field of view of about 79 degrees.

Example 5

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 5.

TABLE 5 Numerical Data Example 5 Unit mm f = 3.83 ih = 3.26 Fno = 2.09TLA = 4.58 ω (°) = 40.0 Surface Data Surface Curvature SurfaceRefractive Abbe Number i Radius r Distance d Index Nd Number νd (Object)Infinity Infinity  1 (Stop) Infinity −0.23250  2* 1.58472 0.55993 1.54455.86  3* 7.18953 0.03498  4* 3.38475 0.24000 1.650 21.54  5* 1.975470.29382  6* 8.00259 0.47043 1.535 55.66  7* −200.00000 0.42900  8*−5.04379 0.62500 1.535 55.66  9* −1.01640 0.11240 10* −3.64800 0.730001.535 55.66 11* 1.38464 0.50000 12 Infinity 0.21000 1.517 64.20 13Infinity 0.44860 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data Lens StartSurface Focal Length 1 2 3.61 2 4 −7.82 3 6 14.40 4 8 2.26 5 10 −1.79Aspheric Surface Data Second Surface Third Surface Fourth Surface FifthSurface Sixth Surface Seventh Surface k 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A4 1.462133E−02−3.520495E−01 −4.558266E−01 −1.917159E−01 −1.416674E−01 −7.419507E−02 A6−8.100385E−02 9.956436E−01 1.285353E+00 5.232698E−01 9.210716E−02−9.551791E−02 A8 1.527277E−01 −1.227163E+00 −1.569546E+00 −5.328908E−01−1.419365E−01 1.570541E−01 A10 −1.114816E−01 4.819144E−01 6.480302E−012.230817E−01 1.704104E−01 −1.806943E−01 A12 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 −2.772339E−02 9.386250E−02 A14 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A160.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 Eighth Surface Ninth Surface Tenth Surface Eleventh Surfacek 0.000000E+00 −4.953710E+00 0.000000E+00 −9.307535E+00 A4 3.972596E−02−1.876714E−01 −8.752030E−02 −7.903379E−02 A6 −1.933768E−01 2.672734E−011.122953E−02 3.552642E−02 A8 3.265343E−01 −2.947786E−01 2.901561E−02−1.289630E−02 A10 −3.962153E−01 2.380602E−01 −1.346353E−02 3.063509E−03A12 2.765839E−01 −1.077455E−01 2.287431E−03 −4.585780E−04 A14−1.047059E−01 2.423403E−02 −1.332263E−04 3.820240E−05 A16 1.695510E−02−2.131588E−03 −9.620300E−07 −1.316394E−06

The imaging lens in Example 5 is a convex surface facing the image-sidesurface of the third lens L3, and satisfies conditional expressions (1)to (9) as shown in Table 8.

FIG. 10 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), anddistortion (%) of the imaging lens in Example 5. As shown in FIG. 10,each aberration is corrected properly.

Total track length in air TLA is 4.58 mm, ratio of total track length todiagonal length is 0.70 as low-profile, and the imaging lens hasbrightness of F2.09 and wide field of view of about 80 degrees.

Example 6

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 6.

TABLE 6 Numerical Data Exemple 6 Unit mm f = 3.90 ih = 3.26 Fno = 2.08TLA = 4.58 ω (°) = 39.5 Surface Data Surface Curvature SurfaceRefractive Abbe Number i Radius r Distance d Index Nd Number νd (Object)Infinity Infinity  1 (Stop) Infinity −0.25250  2* 1.55094 0.61911 1.54455.86  3* 31.47724 0.02300  4* 13.90587 0.24000 1.650 21.54  5* 3.068750.37703  6* 39.48103 0.44240 1.535 55.66  7* −200.00000 0.42408  8*−26.43857 0.69375 1.535 55.66  9* −1.17965 0.20959 10* −2.86274 0.525001.535 55.66 11* 1.51311 0.50000 12 Infinity 0.21000 1.517 64.20 13Infinity 0.38630 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data Lens StartSurface Focal Length 1 2 2.98 2 4 −6.11 3 6 61.69 4 8 2.29 5 10 −1.78Aspheric Surface Data Second Surface Third Surface Fourth Surface FifthSurface Sixth Surface Seventh Surface k −4.551814E−03 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 −2.977431E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A4 1.163852E−02−1.690376E−01 −1.536986E−01 2.133798E−02 −1.385817E−01 −1.088849E−01 A6−7.205089E−02 5.894191E−01 6.706061E−01 1.259507E−01 2.076564E−02−5.781347E−02 A8 1.221111E−01 −8.260600E−01 −8.672882E−01 4.304131E−022.921734E−02 1.045777E−01 A10 −9.373660E−02 3.463443E−01 3.311791E−01−2.196317E−01 −1.111677E−01 −1.204996E−01 A12 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+004.549225E−02 1.741218E−01 1.166781E−01 6.144469E−02 A14 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A160.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 Eighth Surface Ninth Surface Tenth Surface Eleventh Surfacek 0.000000E+00 −4.702861E+00 0.000000E+00 −1.143394E+01 A4 5.419926E−03−5.816745E−02 −1.203187E−01 −8.693692E−02 A6 −1.094900E−01 3.407963E−035.697847E−02 4.321121E−02 A8 1.379961E−01 4.975721E−02 7.028175E−04−1.657845E−02 A10 −1.310420E−01 −4.380366E−02 −3.938325E−03 4.169528E−03A12 6.618553E−02 1.891058E−02 7.243201E−04 −6.674981E−04 A14−1.812554E−02 −4.245194E−03 −3.817594E−05 6.031307E−05 A16 2.406290E−033.810160E−04 −4.018426E−07 −2.281015E−06

The imaging lens in Example 6 is a convex surface facing the image-sidesurface of the third lens L3, and satisfies conditional expressions (1)to (9) as shown in Table 8.

FIG. 12 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), anddistortion (%) of the imaging lens in Example 6. As shown in FIG. 12,each aberration is corrected properly.

Total track length in air TLA is 4.58 mm, ratio of total track length todiagonal length is 0.70 as low-profile, and the imaging lens hasbrightness of F2.08 and wide field of view of about 79 degrees.

Example 7

The basic lens data is shown below in Table 7.

TABLE 7 Numerical Data Example 7 Unit mm f = 3.90 ih = 3.26 Fno = 2.08TLA = 4.58 ω (°) = 39.4 Surface Data Surface Curvature SurfaceRefractive Abbe Number i Radius r Distance d Index Nd Number νd (Object)Infinity Infinity  1 (Stop) Infinity −0.26250  2* 1.56011 0.60767 1.54455.86  3* 23.00000 0.02300  4* 8.66769 0.23100 1.650 21.54  5* 2.652090.36318  6* 28.68485 0.46491 1.535 55.66  7* −200.00000 0.45545  8*−25.61059 0.63763 1.535 55.66  9* −1.33366 0.33421 10* −2.87100 0.487001.535 55.66 11* 1.82690 0.50000 12 Infinity 0.21000 1.517 64.20 13Infinity 0.33527 Image Plane Infinity Constituent Lens Data Lens StartSurface Focal Length 1 2 3.04 2 4 −5.97 3 6 46.94 4 8 2.61 5 10 −2.01Aspheric Surface Data Second Surface Third Surface Fourth Surface FifthSurface Sixth Surface Seventh Surface k 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A4 1.240003E−02−1.966224E−01 −2.029026E−01 −3.010548E−02 −1.418695E−01 −1.128456E−01 A6−6.741343E−02 6.943538E−01 7.947761E−01 2.030602E−01 −3.543066E−03−4.604748E−02 A8 1.144991E−01 −9.039921E−01 −9.609671E−01 −8.507994E−029.911403E−02 8.652979E−02 A10 −8.427047E−02 3.539739E−01 3.586809E−01−5.984523E−02 −2.228508E−01 −1.135003E−01 A12 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+002.269166E−02 7.971970E−02 1.788701E−01 5.826743E−02 A14 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 A160.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+00 0.000000E+000.000000E+00 Eighth Surface Ninth Surface Tenth Surface Eleventh Surfacek 0.000000E+00 −7.402589E+00 0.000000E+00 −1.353587E+01 A4 −1.786706E−02−1.880924E−01 −1.113766E−01 −7.103740E−02 A6 −6.741885E−02 2.488454E−015.245606E−02 2.397357E−02 A8 1.122724E−01 −2.333981E−01 1.131143E−03−4.915606E−03 A10 −1.467424E−01 1.481235E−01 −3.907493E−03 3.508867E−04A12 9.823444E−02 −5.422236E−02 7.177689E−04 2.894085E−05 A14−3.370920E−02 1.020253E−02 −3.534959E−05 −5.958222E−06 A16 4.827133E−03−7.684518E−04 −8.121016E−07 2.718917E−07

The imaging lens in Example 7 is a convex surface facing the image-sidesurface of the third lens L3, and satisfies conditional expressions (1)to (9) as shown in Table 8.

FIG. 14 shows spherical aberration (mm), astigmatism (mm), anddistortion (%) of the imaging lens in Example 7. As shown in FIG. 14,each aberration is corrected properly.

Total track length in air TLA is 4.58 mm, ratio of total track length todiagonal length is 0.70 as low-profile, and the imaging lens hasbrightness of F2.08 and wide field of view of about 79 degrees.

As explained above, according to the imaging lens related to the presentembodiments, there is provided the low-profiled imaging lens having thetotal track length in air TLA smaller than 5 mm, and ratio of totaltrack length to diagonal length smaller than 0.9. There is realized acompact imaging lens having brightness of F2.4 or less, capable ofphotographing having field of view of 70 degrees or more, and havinghigh resolution which aberrations are properly corrected.

In table 8, values of conditional expressions (1) to (9) related to theExamples 1 to 7 are shown.

TABLE 8 Conditional Expression Example 1 Example 2 Example 3 Example 4Example 5 Example 6 Example 7 (1) |r6/f| 49.30 50.29 51.28 50.99 52.2451.28 51.22 (2) (T1/f) × 100 1.03 0.58 1.03 2.56 0.91 0.59 0.59 (3)f1/|f2| 0.50 0.50 0.39 0.41 0.46 0.49 0.51 (4) f45/f −9.11 −9.25 −6.18−3.56 −8.20 −9.76 −14.42 (5) D4/D5 0.88 1.04 0.85 0.78 0.86 1.32 1.31(6) r9/r10 −1.62 −1.44 −5.74 −3.04 −2.63 −1.89 −1.57 (7) TLA/2ih 0.700.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 0.70 (8) ih/f 0.82 0.82 0.84 0.83 0.85 0.840.83 (9) r6/r7 — 22.81 42.34 55.55 39.65 7.56 7.81

When the imaging lens having five lenses related to the presentinvention is applied to an increasingly compact and low-profile portableterminal device such as a mobile phone and a smartphone, an informationterminal such as a game console and a PC, and a camera built in a homeappliance or the like, it is possible to contribute to low-profileness,low F-value and wide field of view, as well as high-performance of thecamera.

According to the present invention, there is obtained a compact imaginglens with high-resolution which realizes the low-profileness, lowF-value and the wide field of view in well balance, and properlycorrects various aberrations.

What is claimed is:
 1. An imaging lens forming an image of an object ona solid-state image sensor, comprising in order from an object side toan image side, a first lens having a meniscus shape with positiverefractive power and a convex surface facing the object side, a secondlens having a meniscus shape with negative refractive power and aconcave surface facing the image side, a third lens having positiverefractive power and a convex surface facing the object side, a fourthlens having a meniscus shape with positive refractive power and a convexsurface facing the image side, and a fifth lens having negativerefractive power and concave surfaces facing the object side and theimage side near an optical axis, as a double-sided aspheric lens,wherein a pole point at an off-axial point is provided on the image-sidesurface of said fifth lens, and below conditional expressions (1) and(9) are satisfied:40<|r6/f|<90  (1)6<r6/r7  (9) where f: the focal length of the overall optical system ofthe imaging lens, r6: curvature radius of the image-side surface of thethird lens, and r7: curvature radius of the object-side surface of thefourth lens.
 2. The imaging lens according to claim 1, wherein aconditional expression (2) below is satisfied:0.5<(T1/f)*100<3.1  (2) where f: the focal length of the overall opticalsystem of the imaging lens, and T1: distance along the optical axis fromthe image-side surface of the first lens to the object-side surface ofthe second lens.
 3. The imaging lens according to claim 1, wherein aconditional expression (3) below is satisfied:0.3<f1/|f2|<0.6  (3) where f1: focal length of the first lens, and f2:focal length of the second lens.
 4. The imaging lens according to claim1, wherein a conditional expression (4) below is satisfied:−27<f45/f<−3  (4) where f: the focal length of the overall opticalsystem of the imaging lens, and f45: the composite focal length of thefourth lens and the fifth lens.
 5. The imaging lens according to claim1, wherein a conditional expression (5) below is satisfied:0.6<D4/D5<1.6  (5) where D4: thickness on the optical axis of the fourthlens, and D5: thickness on the optical axis of the fifth lens.
 6. Theimaging lens according to claim 1, wherein a conditional expression (6)below is satisfied:−6.9<r9/r10<−1.2  (6) where r9: curvature radius of the object-sidesurface of the fifth lens, and r10: curvature radius of the image-sidesurface of the fifth lens.
 7. The imaging lens according to claim 1,wherein a conditional expression (7) below is satisfied:TLA/2ih<0.9  (7) where TLA: total track length in air, and ih: maximumimage height.
 8. The imaging lens according to claim 1, wherein aconditional expression (8) below is satisfied:0.7<ih/f<1.0  (8) where f: the focal length of the overall opticalsystem of the imaging lens, and ih: maximum image height.
 9. The imaginglens according to claim 1, wherein said third lens has a convex surfacefacing an image side.